Editor’s Letter
The Most Critical
Diversity Initiative
Ten years ago, at all but a handful of companies, they were small, unfocused initiatives founded by people with good intentions who couldn’t make a direct link to the business. I’m not talking about diver- sity initiatives in general here, although I certainly could be. I’m talking specifically about employee-resource groups, which in those days were more commonly called employee networks or affinity groups.
Their rapid growth and increasingly
important correlation to measurable business results has been the
cornerstone on which successful diversity programs have been
built. Employee-resource groups
now touch every crucial area of a
company’s future—recruitment,
retention, talent development,
innovation, productivity, customer
relations, marketing and suppliers.
Their benefits are tangible and
measurable.
As we benchmark companies,
we see a clear delineation between
companies that are elevating their
game and those that are either at
the early stages of their diversity
initiatives or are stalled.
With early-stage companies,
there usually are no employee-resource groups, or just a women’s
group. There is often fear on the
part of management that starting additional groups will create a
forum to spread unrest or a social
network that will get in the way of
“real work.”
Those fears are allayed by putting the right processes in place:
a charter tying the group’s work
directly to business goals and ensuring the group is inclusive of anyone
who wants to join, the presence
of a senior executive as a member
of the group to keep it focused,
and business metrics to measure
the group’s contribution to the
company.
Recently, the head of diversity at
a benchmarking client at the early
stages of forming groups came to us
with a question. Her company has a
women’s group and is ready for one
more. Her senior executives want
to create a group for “all minority
employees.”
Our advice, which we support
with data showing the breakdown
of groups at DiversityInc Top 50
companies, is that it is important to
create distinct employee-resource
groups for each traditionally underrepresented group, as their histories
and cultural issues are different.
For more advanced companies, the ability to use these
groups to differentiate themselves from the competition and
to innovate escalates all the
time. In the last year, we’ve seen an
explosion of generational employee
groups and an increasing proliferation of global employee groups, all
tied directly to business results.
We’re also seeing increased
accountability. This year, 84 percent
of DiversityInc CEOs meet regularly
with employee-resource groups,
up dramatically from 44 percent
five years ago. When we meet with
CEOs during the benchmarking
process, they invariably cite
these meetings as crucial to their
understanding of critical issues
facing their customers and clients.
We currently are featuring
our latest research on employee-resource groups on www.
DiversityIncBestPractices.com, and
our recent webinar, featuring Merck
& Co. and Aetna, documents best
practices at two companies that
use their groups for dramatic and
sustainable business results. Go to
www.DiversityIncBestPractices.com
to see webinar highlights.
We’ll be increasing the weighting
and the number of employee-resource-group questions in
The 2010 DiversityInc Top 50
Companies for Diversity® survey,
which goes out in October. If your
company is interested in applying,
please contact top50@DiversityInc.
com. Results will be announced at
our March 9 event in Washington,
D.C., which will focus on cutting-edge issues in global diversity as
well as key trends in federal-government diversity initiatives.
For event information, please
contact events@DiversityInc.com.
Barbara Frankel
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT,
EXECUTIVE EDITOR
editor@DiversityInc.com
Photo credit: © John Lund and Drew Kelly/Blend
@To better understand the stages of corporate diversity, contact Barbara Frankel at bfrankel@DiversityInc.com